Comments on: Driving Is Expensive http://angryromanian.com/2008/01/28/driving-is-expensive/ Wed, 08 Feb 2012 01:17:27 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: zebby http://angryromanian.com/2008/01/28/driving-is-expensive/#comment-344 Wed, 10 Jun 2009 21:30:38 +0000 http://www.angryromanian.com/2008/01/28/driving-is-expensive#comment-344 Mic? F You you racist prick. Is it okay to call an African American the “N” word? Is it okay to call a Latin person a Spick? A Jew a Kyke? I’m sure a even a racist bigot like you has got the point by now. You can make your point without insulting specific racial groups. Especially groups that were instrumental in building this country. Once again F YOU!

]]> By: ANGRY Turk http://angryromanian.com/2008/01/28/driving-is-expensive/#comment-154 Mon, 18 Feb 2008 06:17:16 +0000 http://www.angryromanian.com/2008/01/28/driving-is-expensive#comment-154 Douche – That truly was a stupid ass response. I can not believe
you wasted your time to type that crap. If I was you, I would jump
into oncoming traffic. GENIUS! K8 – Given that i just found out
that you are a friend of a friend, I will refrain from vulgar and
unnecessary responses. I will say this though. I can’t believe you
wasted several minutes of your life to look up and quote the
definition of “snap.” That specific act requires no intelligence,
creativity or education to complete. Good frickin job quoting the
dictionary. You are a WEINER! I only can think of one person lamer
than you, and that person is RUKO. RUKO – 41% of the panel agreed
that momentarily is defined as “in a moment.” 100% agreed that you
are a douche. :)

]]> By: K8sFreeFall http://angryromanian.com/2008/01/28/driving-is-expensive/#comment-153 Wed, 06 Feb 2008 18:13:45 +0000 http://www.angryromanian.com/2008/01/28/driving-is-expensive#comment-153 Speaking of ‘undeducated douche bags’… “Snap: to lose your temper
and act in an aggressive manner.” (urbandictionary.com, definition
#10) This type of behavior is typical among those lacking
sufficient verbal skills with which to express themselves… not
shockingly, there seems to be some correlation between verbal
skills and level of education. Call me crazy.

]]> By: Douche Nozzle http://angryromanian.com/2008/01/28/driving-is-expensive/#comment-152 Wed, 06 Feb 2008 13:52:51 +0000 http://www.angryromanian.com/2008/01/28/driving-is-expensive#comment-152 Turk
Feel free to snap at any time because in your case the stupidity lies within.

P.S. I think Turk likes K8. He’s acting just like an eight year old who pulls the hair and torments the girl he likes. But that’s OK – I’m sure the two of them will have lovely children.

]]> By: Angry Turk http://angryromanian.com/2008/01/28/driving-is-expensive/#comment-151 Mon, 04 Feb 2008 08:08:23 +0000 http://www.angryromanian.com/2008/01/28/driving-is-expensive#comment-151 I have a few words after reading these ridiculous posts. K8, you
just piss me off. Drop the eloquent bullshit and just say it.
Nothing worse than an uneducated douche bag trying to sound like a
genius. RUKO, i know how you feel. Your problem is that you
expected the judicial system to be fair. HAHA FUCKER… Common
sense, logic and equity are completely absent in our judicial
system. Don’t argue with old people, they are more stubborn than
the Romanian himself. P.S. If i get one stupid reply to this
message, i am seriously going to snap. That goes for you TOO K8.
(If you didn’t realize, i said TOO instead of TO… ASS)

]]> By: K8sFreeFall http://angryromanian.com/2008/01/28/driving-is-expensive/#comment-150 Tue, 29 Jan 2008 05:10:59 +0000 http://www.angryromanian.com/2008/01/28/driving-is-expensive#comment-150 Dear Ruko,
This is in fact exactly what I meant to write in place of "Go fuck yourself." However, I thought perhaps it might be lost on someone not knowing the difference between "to" and "too" and thus deemed it not worth my efforts. You, however, have defended your post eloquently and appropriately. TaxExemPt, please pay the woman to your right $375.
Sincerely,
K8sFreeFall

]]> By: Ruko the Wonder Dog http://angryromanian.com/2008/01/28/driving-is-expensive/#comment-144 Tue, 29 Jan 2008 04:31:08 +0000 http://www.angryromanian.com/2008/01/28/driving-is-expensive#comment-144 Taxexempt-

I think you are missing the point. The following too closely ticket is given whenever there is a rear end collision, regardless of the reason for the accident. I was in fact thrown into the car in front of me due to the collision in my rear. While somebody could have been hurt, they were not, and I still received a fine significantly higher than the minimum. The 18 year old man was caught with possession in his vehicle, and it was unclear whether he was high at the time or not (the officer used the terms "showing no signs of ability impaired" and "inconclusive evidence to suggest intoxication"). Being that you seem familiar with marijuana taxexempt, I need not explain how THC can often show no signs of intoxication and hence be very difficult to prove by a simple roadside sobriety test.

As k8sfreefall said, THC found in marijuana does in fact slow motor skills, inhibits perception, and slows reaction time, all very similar to alcohol in moderate doses. If this young man was indeed operating a vehicle, the dangers posed by him far outweighed my fender bender. That is beside the point, but I feel it necessary to address it seeing as how you have brought it up.

Laws in this country are not solely created based on "the danger posed to society". Most laws are based around reasons other than criminal. You can’t walk around naked in public. You can’t steal towels from a hotel. You cannot break monetary contracts. You are not allowed to blast your music at 100 decibels at 3 AM within city limits. It is illegal to possess marijuana or any other illegal drug. These are all laws that exist, and there is a good reason for each one of them. And guess what? None of them revolve around the "the danger posed to society by the act" as you so eloquently wrote.

The bottom line here, Mr. taxexempt, is that this guy intentionally broke a state law. I also broke a law. I broke it unintentionally and arguably uncontrollably. The judge knew this, and threw "intent" out of the legal window. When "intent" is removed from our legal system, we are in serious fucking trouble.

I hope you get my point.

-ruko

]]> By: Elisha http://angryromanian.com/2008/01/28/driving-is-expensive/#comment-147 Tue, 29 Jan 2008 03:21:33 +0000 http://www.angryromanian.com/2008/01/28/driving-is-expensive#comment-147 If pot involves small children dying – where the fuck do I sign up?

]]> By: K8sFreeFall http://angryromanian.com/2008/01/28/driving-is-expensive/#comment-148 Tue, 29 Jan 2008 03:18:24 +0000 http://www.angryromanian.com/2008/01/28/driving-is-expensive#comment-148 Dear TaxExemPt,
Have you not seen the "Just say no" advertising campaign?!? While under the influence of "some harmless plant" (and thus in possession of said harmless plant), one might fall asleep while babysitting and a small child will inevitably drown. In Ruko’s "following too closely" case, however, no small children died. Thus, I conclude: Go Fuck Yourself. How is that for logic? I anxiously anticipate your next critique of my reasoning skills.
Sincerely,
K8sFreeFall

]]> By: TaxExemPt http://angryromanian.com/2008/01/28/driving-is-expensive/#comment-146 Tue, 29 Jan 2008 01:59:39 +0000 http://www.angryromanian.com/2008/01/28/driving-is-expensive#comment-146 Dear Kate’s in Free Fall
What wonderful reasoning and logic you hold. Hopefully by the time you are 18 you will hit the ground.
TaxExemPt

]]>